Sean H
Charter Member
i just wonder how P1 plans to bring these guys all together and bring old the sideliners and new racers?
$$$
i just wonder how P1 plans to bring these guys all together and bring old the sideliners and new racers?
I think there is a difference between being competitive, (having a chance to win), and having no chance. The identical boats with Bravo's and 6's are competitive as long as only the one gear ratio is allowed in the 6 boats. (This is from everything I've asked current racers about). So, with weight and gear ratio restrictions boats can be in the same class. But, with the gear ratio changes allowed in SV on the 6 boats, the Bravo boats had no chance.
Is this wrong information?
maybe in calm water a bravo would have a chance but in rough forget about.
i base this off of broken bravos i've see first hand vs seeing only two #6s fail and they where on cats.
the #6 skeg is much bigger and helps in turning
#6 gimble can handle alot more stress, especially of the heavier twin vees, allowing less concerns when turning. seen alot of bravo vees break a gimble when they flat spin. where's wahoo ?
you could basically beat the hell out of a six in rough compared to a bravo so reliability would be a big concern
Powerboat P1 owner was in Key West. I was at private social meeting with him on Thursday night along with some of the P1 Racers which did run their Vees in Key West. Unfortunately they had some bad luck on the course...you would think if P1 wanted to make a statement that they would have just showed up in KW.
I think there is a difference between being competitive, (having a chance to win), and having no chance. The identical boats with Bravo's and 6's are competitive as long as only the one gear ratio is allowed in the 6 boats. (This is from everything I've asked current racers about). So, with weight and gear ratio restrictions boats can be in the same class. But, with the gear ratio changes allowed in SV on the 6 boats, the Bravo boats had no chance.
Is this wrong information?
from what i've heard the newer fountains like miccusukee, and fountain worldwide (which ever one had #6s) were running in the teens with 525 package. older fountains with bravo's were in the low 100's. partly new boat, partly #6.
saying that the six can't change gear would be the same as limiting them on prop size.
sure you can slow them down to run the same top speed but this ain't drag racing so how you help the bravo in the turns?
from what i've heard the newer fountains like miccusukee, and fountain worldwide (which ever one had #6s) were running in the teens with 525 package. older fountains with bravo's were in the low 100's. partly new boat, partly #6.
saying that the six can't change gear would be the same as limiting them on prop size.
sure you can slow them down to run the same top speed but this ain't drag racing so how you help the bravo in the turns?
ok..somebody please explain to me, just how this is going to work ('im not saying it wont, just trying to understand) an org. (powerboat p1) is going to come here ( a place with more orgs and classes than boats) and spend a gazillion dollars adding another org and even more classes to get racers to play. And it has people so excited they want to change the names of their classes... some people seem to be on their knees with their arms outstretched singing hallaluya.... Maybe Im wrong (I hope so) but whats in it for powerboat p-1 besides hemmoraghhing cash? I don't know boat racing that well thus I am asking for an explination, but usually when something is so wildly heralded as the second comming shows up, it's usually followed by the anti-christ and great discontent as unreal expectations are not met.
Not entering the fray, but just a heads up, the kilo record with a 38/525/bravo pkg is 112 and change(Invensys, now Wazzup Racing) and the kilo with the 40/525/6 pkg is 115.000(Micosukkee) with the rule of thumb being kilos are 10 mph faster than avg race speed that puts them @ 102 and 105 respectively.
I think there is a difference between being competitive, (having a chance to win), and having no chance. The identical boats with Bravo's and 6's are competitive as long as only the one gear ratio is allowed in the 6 boats. (This is from everything I've asked current racers about). So, with weight and gear ratio restrictions boats can be in the same class. But, with the gear ratio changes allowed in SV on the 6 boats, the Bravo boats had no chance.
Is this wrong information?
Scott,
5775 is your limit. If they tell you what about the second engine show them a trolling motor or a paddle and you are good to go.
What I do not get is the "lets make everthing equal or (parity idea)". I know you all have an investment but if there is a product that is not up to racing standards why are you racing it?
If you put a MPH number on the class it will keep people honest. no scales, no dynos, no lines waiting to crane in or out, no lines at tech just give the inspector an SD Card etc.... keep it simple. Hey, wait that is P class.
pat W
build an Illmore with the drive and put it in a 28 to 32 ' canopy boat and back your opinion ??? QUOTE]
WHY canopy ???? HP/WEIGHT , wouldn't that allow all kind of boats , open or not ??![]()
When we raced the Phantom in KW in 08 we won P3 only because Gino broke a Bravo on sunday. He beat us by a matter on sec wed and fri and i agree it was great racing, but he finally got bite with the bravo drives. You wont see any new SV being built with Bravo drives and there is a reason for that.