Buoy
Founding Member
I saw a blurb in the local newspaper today, and had to research this a bit further.
The girl is 13, and wants to be the youngest to sail the globe.
The parents are supportive.
The Dutch gov't is putting this into council, and trying to take the girl into protective custody.
My wife and I got in an hour and a half long debate (argument...) about whether she should be allowed to do this or not.
My opinion -
If the girl is well trained, has a good solid plan, and that there are some safety nets in place (a chase boat 25-50 mi away, or the like...) let her try it!
If she contacts the chase boat, forget the solo record.
Where does the gov't have the right to step into this?
If she is confident and well trained, and the parents think she is capable, and are supportive, let her do it.
My wife thinks I'm absolutely nutz.
Now, I have a 10 yr old daughter, and a 23 yr old step-daughter. My 10 yr old would not be capable of making such a voyage in 3 yrs, and neither would the 23 yr old. I doubt either ever would.
But, I'm guessing that this girl has some extensive training, and some skill, and also is mature enough at a young age to take on something like this. I don't see where the gov't has any business not allowing her to embark on this trip. She has the full support of her parents.
I have to assume that her parents have trained her well, and have helped her carefully go over her plan and preparation for this trip. They must feel confident that she is fully capable of completing this.
How else would you allow your own child to take on such a challenge?
As I mentioned, neither my daughter, or step-daughter are capable of something like this, and I don't think either ever will be. I don't think I ever would be.
My wifes argument is that the girl is only 13.
My argument is that its not age, but instead, maturity, training, and skill.
I say let her go, but provide a bit of a safety net ( a chase boat 25-50 mi away) - but as I mentioned, if she contacts the chase boat, no record.
My wife argued that the "safety net" would not be the same as sailing the globe solo.
I'm kind of torn on that fact.
I don't want to see a child get killed out on the water, but at what point does the safety become too much to consider it a solo around the globe?
Is wearing an EPIRB also too much?
What are your thoughts?
Here's a link to an article about this.
http://www.theoceans.net/news.php?id=18593
The girl is 13, and wants to be the youngest to sail the globe.
The parents are supportive.
The Dutch gov't is putting this into council, and trying to take the girl into protective custody.
My wife and I got in an hour and a half long debate (argument...) about whether she should be allowed to do this or not.
My opinion -
If the girl is well trained, has a good solid plan, and that there are some safety nets in place (a chase boat 25-50 mi away, or the like...) let her try it!
If she contacts the chase boat, forget the solo record.
Where does the gov't have the right to step into this?
If she is confident and well trained, and the parents think she is capable, and are supportive, let her do it.
My wife thinks I'm absolutely nutz.
Now, I have a 10 yr old daughter, and a 23 yr old step-daughter. My 10 yr old would not be capable of making such a voyage in 3 yrs, and neither would the 23 yr old. I doubt either ever would.
But, I'm guessing that this girl has some extensive training, and some skill, and also is mature enough at a young age to take on something like this. I don't see where the gov't has any business not allowing her to embark on this trip. She has the full support of her parents.
I have to assume that her parents have trained her well, and have helped her carefully go over her plan and preparation for this trip. They must feel confident that she is fully capable of completing this.
How else would you allow your own child to take on such a challenge?
As I mentioned, neither my daughter, or step-daughter are capable of something like this, and I don't think either ever will be. I don't think I ever would be.
My wifes argument is that the girl is only 13.
My argument is that its not age, but instead, maturity, training, and skill.
I say let her go, but provide a bit of a safety net ( a chase boat 25-50 mi away) - but as I mentioned, if she contacts the chase boat, no record.
My wife argued that the "safety net" would not be the same as sailing the globe solo.
I'm kind of torn on that fact.
I don't want to see a child get killed out on the water, but at what point does the safety become too much to consider it a solo around the globe?
Is wearing an EPIRB also too much?
What are your thoughts?
Here's a link to an article about this.
http://www.theoceans.net/news.php?id=18593