Size 1024 blows out the forum causing people to scroll right to left.
Perhaps the max should be 800 wide?
Just a thought....
Thread: Discussion about Picture Sizing
Results 1 to 20 of 73
-
SHARKEY-IMAGESGuest10-21-2008 04:04 PM
-
10-21-2008 04:26 PM
good idea sharkey - I hate it when that happens. - jeff
-
10-21-2008 04:43 PM
Does that explain where GLH's thread went ??
-
10-21-2008 04:49 PM
His thread did not go anywhere. Just the way oversize pice were removed.
-
10-21-2008 04:50 PM
Um can't seem to find it. Just curious I know you all are still working on everything
-
10-21-2008 05:01 PM
Since were on the picture subject...is there a reason why it's limited to only 3 pics per post. I believe you can allow as many as 10 per post (such as the scope website) or even a little more would be better than 3 (the performance boats website allows 5).
Making the best in the industry BETTER since 1990...LIP-SHIP Performance: 305-933-9988
2010 Desert Storm Poker Run extravaganza - 04/22 through 4/25 Lake Havasu, Az.
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- St. Petersburg, FL
- Posts
- 3,965
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- St. Petersburg, FL
- Posts
- 3,965
-
-
10-21-2008 05:26 PM
Sharkey I guess it depends on your screen size?
I like the 1028x768 best, it doesn't go off any of my 17in computer screens.
this is a
800x600
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- St. Petersburg, FL
- Posts
- 3,965
-
10-21-2008 05:33 PM
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- St. Petersburg, FL
- Posts
- 3,965
-
10-21-2008 05:46 PM
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 2,001
10-21-2008 05:53 PMIt is the combination of the linked pic slowing down the load time and blowing the screen out to the side. As you know when it blows out it de-formats the rest of the thread and makes it hard to read in some cases, it is a major complaint people seem to have.
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- St. Petersburg, FL
- Posts
- 3,965
10-21-2008 05:56 PMYou are correct, Strip, in that there is no bandwidth being pulled from SO.com (because it's not stored on, nor loading from SO.com), but the issue is with the actual thread itself getting distorted (going off to the right, things not lining up, etc.), and it can take way longer to load the entire thread because of an external picture or two holding up page load.
The general consensus was to politely request that those enormous pics be kept to a minimum.
-
SHARKEY-IMAGESGuest10-21-2008 06:03 PM
I use 1024 x 768 screen size myself. But you have to leave room for the display of the screen name and the rest of the forum's borders.
An attachment is not an issue of blowing out the forum because you are opening a separate page to view the image. It is the linked images.
I refrain from using anything larger than 800 max wide for linked pics so that everyone reading the forum does not have to scroll left and right.
Here is an example of the 800 wide:
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 4,796
10-21-2008 06:05 PMIt depends on screen resolution. I have 50-year-old eyes and 1600 monitor resolution equals icons I can't read and eyestrain headaches. I also have a 5-year-old LCD monitor. Above 800x600 means huge images.
-
SHARKEY-IMAGESGuest
-
SHARKEY-IMAGESGuest10-21-2008 06:09 PM
The 580 looks like it keeps everything inline including the screen name section.