Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. Collapse Details
    Interesting Banking Info
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #2
    Charter Member Sea-Dated's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Tulsa, OK/GLOC
    Posts
    4,285
    Nice
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
     
    #3
    Registered smdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    New Carlisle, IN
    Posts
    24
    A good read. Thanks
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #4
    Registered waybomb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South of the north pole
    Posts
    30
    Quote-This is not just massive evidence of hoarding of funds by the banks. It also means that the banks are undermining the Obama administration's attempts to stimulate the economy. Just as President Obama pumps $787 billion of deficit spending into the economy, the banks take $771 billion out of it and sock it away in the Fed's vaults. end quote

    Ok, so I'm no banker, but I know one in town. Their "regulator" strongly suggested they take 17mm in funds that they did not need nor want. They are a small conservative bank that does not want the govt's fingers in their business any more than possible.

    The board wrangled over this.

    The thought is if the regulator strongly suggests, you do. They ended up taking 12mm and immediately depositing it.

    They did not need it, did not want it, had no borrowers for it, so they deposited it. I bet hundreds of small conservative (solvent) banks did the same thing for the same reasons.

    Undermining Obama? Give me a freakin break, he seems to want to undermine us all.
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #5
    Charter Member Tommy Gun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    St. Louis; LOTO
    Posts
    1,816
    Quote Originally Posted by waybomb View Post
    Quote-
    Undermining Obama? Give me a freakin break, he seems to want to undermine us all.
    Uh, yes. What is really going on is beyond reasonable comprehension.
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #6
    Charter Member GregP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Annapolis MD
    Posts
    92
    Quote Originally Posted by waybomb View Post
    Quote-Ok, so I'm no banker, but I know one in town. Their "regulator" strongly suggested they take 17mm in funds that they did not need nor want. They are a small conservative bank that does not want the govt's fingers in their business any more than possible.

    The board wrangled over this.

    The thought is if the regulator strongly suggests, you do. They ended up taking 12mm and immediately depositing it.

    They did not need it, did not want it, had no borrowers for it, so they deposited it. I bet hundreds of small conservative (solvent) banks did the same thing for the same reasons.
    So your friends bank submitted a falsified TARP funds request (did it really say "we don't need the money, won't use the money, but want our share anyway"?) but it's not their fault since, after all, they are only responsible for running the bank? Sorry, but your fiend is part of the problem with the current "Big Greed" business environment and belongs in jail. You can still visit him on Thrusdays.

    -g
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #7
    Registered waybomb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South of the north pole
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by GregP View Post
    So your friends bank submitted a falsified TARP funds request (did it really say "we don't need the money, won't use the money, but want our share anyway"?) but it's not their fault since, after all, they are only responsible for running the bank? Sorry, but your fiend is part of the problem with the current "Big Greed" business environment and belongs in jail. You can still visit him on Thrusdays.-g
    Look, I said I am no banker. I don't know if it was TARP funds or some other program. The feds wanted them to take money to lend out if needed, and to buy any distressed assets of any local banks. Maybe the feds figured a local bank was going down. I have no clue. This particular bank has their own money to lend, and can get more if needed. Their books show that.

    They want to give the money back. The feds want them to lend it. They don't need to. The govt won;t let them give the money back.
    Reply With Quote
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •