Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. Collapse Details
    Cat Back Exhaust
    #1
    I'm thinking about putting a cat back exhaust on my 6.0 has anybody picked up any performance or mpg?
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Craney View Post
    I'm thinking about putting a cat back exhaust on my 6.0 has anybody picked up any performance or mpg?
    I've done it twice on gas motors, late 90's Yukon with a 350 and current is a 5.4 liter ford. Both Borla systems, very quiet under 3000-3500 nice rumble when you put your foot in it. Picked up performance and mpg, but had my foot in it more so it was a wash.
    Run until it sounds expensive
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
     
    #3
    Charter Member Sydwayz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    All over da place.
    Posts
    699
    6.0L Gas GM
    or
    6.0L PSD Ford

    BIG difference.

    Flowmaster for GM Gas
    MBRP for Ford PSD

    I have experience with both systems on different engines and like the results.
    Brian Tillett; Active Thunder Factory Representative
    wwwActiveThunderBoats.com
    brian(a)activethunderboats.com
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #4
    Registered inbetween's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Mentor, Ohio
    Posts
    1,827
    I just bought a few parts at murray's and made my own!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails RedneckExhaustJul30_001.jpg  
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #5
    Registered inbetween's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Mentor, Ohio
    Posts
    1,827
    Seriously though, for the powerstroke, there's a ton of info in the forums at powerstroke.org
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #6
    Registered Shockwave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kitchener,Ontario
    Posts
    122
    I put the complete 4" Banks system on my 05 and 07 PS Diesel .
    It does make a definite change in performance . I can't say how much fuel you save put performance jumps for sure . I installed the turbo back set up . Re installed the cat. I think whats the point of freeing things up after the cat when you still have a restrictive 3" pipe coming out of the turbo .
    Paul
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #7
    Charter Member MacGyver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Appleton, Wisconsin. Where we have 2 seasons... winter and road construction
    Posts
    4,120
    I went cat back on my 5.3 Chevy. I didn't notice much of an improvement in mileage, but it sounds awesome. And if you don't go with stainless all the way, at least go with the stainless tips.
    ________
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
     
    #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Sydwayz View Post
    6.0L Gas GM
    or
    6.0L PSD Ford

    BIG difference.

    Flowmaster for GM Gas
    MBRP for Ford PSD

    I have experience with both systems on different engines and like the results.
    Sorry 6.0 PSD Ford
    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
     
    #9
    Charter Member Sydwayz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    All over da place.
    Posts
    699
    MBRP 1st Choice
    Banks 2nd Choice

    I don't know the 6.0 as well as the 7.3 though. Check anything before you purchase on www.thedieselstop.com . I don't know if you like the turbo whistle or not, but I LOVE it on a 6.0L PSD with big exhaust. If you go so far as to dump the cat, and go with a turbo-back exhaust, the truck has an awesome whistle/note. I've got a turbo back setup on 7.3L; (no cat originally) 4" all the way back to a single muffler, and split tips behind each rear wheel.
    Brian Tillett; Active Thunder Factory Representative
    wwwActiveThunderBoats.com
    brian(a)activethunderboats.com
    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
     
    #10
    Charter Member Slick02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    A tree in the woods in Florida
    Posts
    176
    I've had 3 6.0 powerstrokes, and on the first one we did catback exhaust, no noticable incease in mpg, or performance and egt's stayed the same, on the last 2 I used full turbo back systems and noticed measurable power and mpg increases(as long as you kept your foot out of it) with a 200 degree decrease in egts which is the real measure on how well a system works.
    The more I know about people, the more I like my dogs
    Reply With Quote
     

  11. Collapse Details
     
    #11
    Charter Member FULL FORCE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Cleveland/Marblehead, Ohio
    Posts
    991
    Turbo back is a must for improvements, I did 4" turbo back Summit exhaust, I did not want to spend a ton on exhast with a 250,00 m iles truck that I drive all winter, they all pretty much perform the same, just some look nicer, I added the stainless 5" tip for looks, usually you will not notice much until it is chipped.

    I love the sound...280,000 miles now and ran 15.1 so far overboosting map sensor...99 7.3... love my truck!
    35 Cigarette Mistress
    Reply With Quote
     

  12. Collapse Details
     
    #12
    I still love my MBRP after 5+ years on a 2000 7.3 psd
    Reply With Quote
     

  13. Collapse Details
     
    #13
    MBRP. 140,000 miles no issues.. turbo back (no cat). Sounds awesome, ZERO highway drone.
    Reply With Quote
     

  14. Collapse Details
     
    #14
    we recommend MBRP turbo back. Sounds great, cooler egts. The fitment is perfect as well. for installing these kits on trucks we have been through a few and the MBRP fits perfect never any trouble with pieces not fitting.
    Reply With Quote
     

  15. Collapse Details
     
    #15
    I just installed a MBRP on mine. Easy install and the price was right.
    Reply With Quote
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •