Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 69
  1. Collapse Details
     
    #41
    Icon/Charter Member T2x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wyckoff, NJ
    Posts
    1,099
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan Beckley View Post
    Sorry, but I don't claim to be an EXPERT on this subject. I was born in 75 actually so I was alittle older than 5. I actually spent a lot of time with the Lavin's when they came to the Keys every year. In 1985 when the won the Modified class worlds I was with Mark, Francine, & Miles in the boat parade. Mark is one of my heros, & I have a picture of the 35' hanging in my livingroom to this day.....
    Hey Ryan:

    I was teasing you...... I clearly recall how passionate you were...and are.... about the sport..... and as I said...I can relate. What I am reacting to is the assumption that today's boats are somehow a quantum leap ahead of the mid 80's cats...... and that is nonsense. After all even Peter's 24's and 32's were both a product of that same era....and nothing is demonstrably better than those hulls today..... in fact his bottom design and angle of attack are very similar on the newer hulls....albeit with more anti stuff built into the forward entry (Ala Big JJ)......

    There is (sadly) nothing really new under the sun in hull development....... even Reggie's preposterous "beak" is now pushing 20 years in age.......as are the steps that he and the Fiore's "invented".

    T2x
    Allergic to Nonsense
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #42
    Sort of off topic but since this kind of went a little off course about hull designs..

    I asked on the Statement thread with no reply- is the front edge of their cat for aesthetics or serve a function?
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
     
    #43
    Charter Member / Competitor Ryan Beckley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sarasota, Fl
    Posts
    746
    I was told the Statement packs more air into the tunnel and make the entry of the boat more aerodynamic......
    Ryan Beckley
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #44
    I was wondering the same thing. I saw it in Miami and it is unlike any other tunnel entry I have seen. Is there any merit to it that has been proven to work or is it an untested theory?
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #45
    Quote Originally Posted by fobes View Post
    I was wondering the same thing. I saw it in Miami and it is unlike any other tunnel entry I have seen. Is there any merit to it that has been proven to work or is it an untested theory?
    I would like to hear what T2x thinks about this also......

    I'll take my 40 Skater over that "new" design any day of the week...
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #46
    An interesting side note. With the advent of the 50' cats, it became possible to beat the boat to death, while experiencing an "arm chair" ride. That was partly true of the 38's, but absolutley true of the 50's.
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #47
    What is the idea behind the Statement hull design?
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
     
    #48
    Sponsor / Charter Member Rik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    390
    The 50' of today are not measured the same way those 50' that were built in the past were measured. Those boats today would be a 55'!

    Today, they count from the deck to the tip of the sponson. A 50' Mystic for example is a 44' Bottom with a 40' LWL.

    The 48' Cougar probably had a 43-44' LWL and was somewhat heavier but also had less tunnel compression in comparison.

    I think the theory was, four smaller engines would live a lot longer than two larger engines. (Say hello to Keith Eickert new V16!) As back in the early 80's, 800 hp was a stretch.

    Joe Mach's 4 engine boat would reach 175 ish according to Smitty and Lanier. Fast by any generations expectations.
    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
     
    #49
    Icon/Charter Member T2x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wyckoff, NJ
    Posts
    1,099
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Rik View Post
    Joe Mach's 4 engine boat would reach 175 ish according to Smitty and Lanier. Fast by any generations expectations.
    And that boat would dwarf a Mystic in size........ I always loved the lines on that thing....it reminded me of some kind of a wild mid 50's fighter/bomber. It looked like nothing else before or since.

    Today everything is buttery smooth....and redundant...except for the MTI's which are simply .......ugly.....and I know ugly.....after all we created the Shadow "dumpster" cat....

    T2x
    Allergic to Nonsense
    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
     
    #50
    Icon/Charter Member T2x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wyckoff, NJ
    Posts
    1,099
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by 40FlatDeck View Post
    I would like to hear what T2x thinks about this also......

    I'll take my 40 Skater over that "new" design any day of the week...
    Is that the cat with the "filligree" on the inside of the pickle forks..... increasing the mold cost for no apparent reason?

    My first impression takes me back to my favorite Renato Molinari story.

    Molinari OWNED outboard tunnel boat design in the late 60's and early 70's. In '71 or so he debuted (see 1st picture below with Bobby Hering at the wheel) a beautiful pickle forked variant of his tried and true full tunnel hull. After winning it's debut races, he put small vertical fins on the forward pickle forks. Within weeks most other racers had similar fins on their (now pickle forked) boats. At that point Renato put small fins on the after planes abreast of the engines....and won....... You guessed it, the others quickly followed suit. Renato then put horizontal "winglets" on the fins and upright portions of the canopies....and won...... Others followed quickly (see Miles Hull below on the right)....

    Finally, at seasons end, Renato appeared with a hull in the original form sans all the fins and winglets...and won again. When asked about why he had discarded all of the added "aero-technical" hardware...... He replied "That Sh*t never did anything anyway."

    ...But it sure kept the others from doing actual testing and development.

    The Statement makes the same kind of "statement" to me.

    T2x
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Boat%20Racing%201%20023.jpg   1975%20Miles%20CFL%20og%20LvT.jpg  
    Allergic to Nonsense
    Reply With Quote
     

  11. Collapse Details
     
    #51
    Sponsor / Charter Member Rik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    390
    Quote Originally Posted by T2x View Post
    And that boat would dwarf a Mystic in size........ I always loved the lines on that thing....it reminded me of some kind of a wild mid 50's fighter/bomber. It looked like nothing else before or since.

    Today everything is buttery smooth....and redundant...except for the MTI's which are simply .......ugly.....and I know ugly.....after all we created the Shadow "dumpster" cat....

    T2x
    Maybe all those rivets disrupted the laminer flow (like vortex generators) of the air over it so it would not blow over

    Maybe CUV knew something.

    No reference to a Mystic meant.
    Reply With Quote
     

  12. Collapse Details
     
    #52
    I just realized (again) how much I love reading your post T2x!
    Reply With Quote
     

  13. Collapse Details
     
    #53
    Contributor Steve 1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Beautiful Fort Lauderdale
    Posts
    2,333
    I used a tunnel like that on my 40' Cheetahcats in 93!
    Slippery when wet. PODLESS TUNNEL www.cheetahcat.com ,Repairs, Modifications and Truing Cheap reliable speed.
    Reply With Quote
     

  14. Collapse Details
     
    #54
    Quote Originally Posted by T2x View Post
    Is that the cat with the "filligree" on the inside of the pickle forks..... increasing the mold cost for no apparent reason?

    My first impression takes me back to my favorite Renato Molinari story.

    Molinari OWNED outboard tunnel boat design in the late 60's and early 70's. In '71 or so he debuted (see 1st picture below) a beautiful pickle forked variant of his tried and true full tunnel hull. After winning it's debut races, he put small vertical fins on the forward pickle forks. Within weeks most other racers had similar fins on their (now pickle forked) boats. At that point Renato put small fins on the after planes abreast of the engines....and won....... You guessed it, the others quickly followed suit. Renato then put horizontal "winglets" on the fins and upright portions of the canopies....and won...... Others followed quickly (see Miles Hull below on the right)....

    Finally, at seasons end, Renato appeared with a hull in the original form sans all the fins and winglets...and won again. When asked about why he had discarded all of the added "aero-technical" hardware...... He replied "That Sh*t never did anything anyway."

    ...But it sure kept the others from doing actual testing and development.

    The Statement makes the same kind of "statement" to me.

    T2x


    Didn't Buzzi basically do the same thing with his rear "wing"??
    Reply With Quote
     

  15. Collapse Details
     
    #55
    Icon/Charter Member T2x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wyckoff, NJ
    Posts
    1,099
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by 40FlatDeck View Post


    Didn't Buzzi basically do the same thing with his rear "wing"??
    Yes, but he laughed all the way to the bank with his idea. It seemed that all the Euro-trash would buy (lease) anything he offered, and the more gimmicks the better. On the other hand he has a great sense of humor and probably got some good chuckles out of his "flights of fancy".
    Allergic to Nonsense
    Reply With Quote
     

  16. Collapse Details
    Here is a good pic of her running
    #56
    I think it was the Trump worlds in 89...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Jessie James3 _1989_.jpg  
    Reply With Quote
     

  17. Collapse Details
     
    #57
    Charter Member Dude! Sweet!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Posts
    3,951
    Where'd the drives, rudders, etc. all end up? Seems like single-purpose stuff, so I'm guessing none of it's hanging off the back of an American Offshore cat in the Monongahela River...


    "Tear gas and draft beer don't mix."
    Reply With Quote
     

  18. Collapse Details
     
    #58
    The whole boat (Big JJ) minus engines was at Archer Marine for a long time. In 93/94??? It was sold minus motors and is sitting in the AZ desert as far as I know.

    pat W
    Unique Innovative Drivetrain Solutions
    Reply With Quote
     

  19. Collapse Details
     
    #59
    Founding Member/Contributor Sean Stinson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Internationally Infamous
    Posts
    2,339
    Do tell Pat someone is looking for it earlier in this thread
    Reply With Quote
     

  20. Collapse Details
     
    #60
    Icon/Charter Member T2x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wyckoff, NJ
    Posts
    1,099
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by chewiekw View Post
    I think it was the Trump worlds in 89...

    Thank you...That is the best picture of it running I have seen.

    I love the internet.

    T2x
    Allergic to Nonsense
    Reply With Quote
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •