Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. Collapse Details
    Study: Fatal Car Crashes Involving Marijuana Have Tripled
    #1
    Founding Member / Super Moderator Ratickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    37,352
    Blog Entries
    44
    SEATTLE (CBS Seattle) – According to a recent study, fatal car crashes involving pot use have tripled in the U.S.

    “Currently, one of nine drivers involved in fatal crashes would test positive for marijuana,” Dr. Guohua Li, director of the Center for Injury Epidemiology and Prevention at Columbia, and co-author of the study told HealthDay News.

    Researchers from Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health gathered data from six states – California, Hawaii, Illinois, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and West Virginia – that perform toxicology tests on drivers involved in fatal car accidents. This data included over 23,500 drivers that died within one hour of a crash between 1999 and 2010.

    Li reported in the study that alcohol contributed to about 40 percent of traffic fatalities throughout the decade.

    The researchers found that drugs played an increasing role in fatal traffic accidents. Drugged driving accounted for more than 28 percent of traffic deaths in 2010, which is 16 percent more than it was in 1999.

    The researchers also found that marijuana was the main drug involved in the increase. It contributed to 12 percent of fatal crashes, compared to only 4 percent in 1999.

    “If a driver is under the influence of alcohol, their risk of a fatal crash is 13 times higher than the risk of the driver who is not under the influence of alcohol,” Li said. “But if the driver is under the influence of both alcohol and marijuana, their risk increased to 24 times that of a sober person.”

    Researchers found that the increase in marijuana use occurred across all ages for males and females.

    Jonathan Adkins, deputy executive director of the Governors Highway Safety Association, told HealthDay News that marijuana impairs driving in much the same way that alcohol does.

    “This study shows an alarming increase in driving under the influence of drugs, and, in particular, it shows an increase in driving under the influence of both alcohol and drugs,” Jan Withers, national president of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, added.

    “MADD is concerned anytime we hear about an increase in impaired driving, since it’s 100 percent preventable,” Withers said. “When it comes to drugged driving versus drunk driving, the substances may be different but the consequences are the same – needless deaths and injuries.”

    Adkins noted that the legalization of marijuana in some states makes these findings important to traffic safety officials.

    “It’s a wake-up call for us in highway safety,” Adkins added. “The legalization of pot is going to spread to other states. It’s not even a partisan issue at this point. Our expectation is this will become the norm rather than the rarity.”

    Li added that police do not have a test as accurate as the Breathalyzer to check a driver’s marijuana intoxication level.

    “In the case of marijuana, I would say in maybe five years or more you will see some testing method or technique that may not as accurate as the Breathalyzer, but is more accurate than the testing devices we have today,” Li said.

    The study was published online in the American Journal of Epidemiology.


    http://seattle.cbslocal.com/2014/02/...-have-tripled/
    Getting bad advice is unfortunate, taking bad advice is a Serious matter!!
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #2
    Founding Member Bobcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Gato RD. Little Torch Key
    Posts
    25,788
    Can't we just put Smoke detectors in cars !
    Parabellum FJ²B
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
     
    #3
    They don't have an accurate level of intoxication test for marijuana. If its simply found in the body, its automatically called the cause. Its like having one drink and saying the alcohol was what caused the crash. Maybe shows more people smoke marijuana, not that it contributes to more accidents.
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #4
    Founding Member Buoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Apache Jct. AZ
    Posts
    5,290
    More people smoke pot than you'd think.

    I've known plenty.
    It doesn't bother me, but it was never my thing. I just like beer.

    Years ago, had a buddy get caught with a small baggie in a bar restroom.
    He told the cop "I keep trying to flush it, but it just shows up back in my pocket"
    Cop says "Oh yeah, prove it"
    So he tossed it in the toilet and flushed it.
    Cop says "Ok, empty your pockets"
    There was nothing in his pockets
    Cop says "Where are the drugs"??
    Buddy says "What drugs"?
    "Keep the bottle on the bar Ira, I won't be long".
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #5
    Founding Member / Super Moderator Ratickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    37,352
    Blog Entries
    44
    It does bother me that they are allowing recreational marijuana in Washington and Oregon but have no accurate test to determine if the person is under the influence of the drug at the time of an incident. It doesn't matter if it's on the road driving, or at the work place operating a forklift or stamping press. In all of those types of operations you are endangering other people if you do something stupid because you're using. In the workplace, you will lose your job if tested positive, period. There is no choice, insurance demands you keep others safe or you will lose it.
    Getting bad advice is unfortunate, taking bad advice is a Serious matter!!
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #6
    Founding Member fund razor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Lake Nasty
    Posts
    13,360
    Drugged driving accounted for more than 28 percent of traffic deaths in 2010, which is 16 percent more than it was in 1999.

    So, what you are essentially saying is, that people in 1999 should have partied like it was 2010.
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #7
    Founding Member / Super Moderator Ratickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    37,352
    Blog Entries
    44
    You figured out the moral of the story?
    Getting bad advice is unfortunate, taking bad advice is a Serious matter!!
    Reply With Quote
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •