Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24
  1. Collapse Details
    Which Boat Runs Better In Rougher Water..33 PP Or 33 AT
    #1
    Charter Member Jassman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Diamondead, MS
    Posts
    474
    First off, Im not trying to start a war..Im doing some research for a buddy who is looking at another 33 foot boat that I dont want him to buy. I suggested these two models, and have been on both, but only 1-2's...and dont have enough seat time to answer his questions properly. As to comfort and size I gave the nod to AT.. as to looks I choose PP.. Which boat is quicker and handles various types of water...better.. Thanks for the help. Jeff
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #2
    Registered DollaBill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Worldwide - Blue Martini Hall of Fame - Your sisters house
    Posts
    2,740
    never been on an AT but the PP is a sweet ride
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
     
    #3
    I would definately go with the 33PP! Blasted off of 8ft waves in Lauderdale inlet in one many years ago. It was an awesome piece!
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #4
    I've never been in a 33 AT but I'm sure it's a sweet ride. Owned a 33" PP for a few years, it was my dream boat and it delivered in all areas. I ran it in in Long Island Sound which can snot up quite nicely and the ride in 3's & 4's and the occasional hole is solid and predictable. Not sure I'd be out in 8s like DaveP in a 33', I might have some sackage shrinkage in those conditions!!

    My boat with 502s was a mid 70s boat with stock 26s. My buddies 33' with 525s and stock 30s ran a consistent 87, he might have nicked a mph or two more but not with me in the boat. When I'd hit those bigger holes the boat handled them nicely, never a rattle, just a solid boat that inspired confidence when you got a bit over your head in the nasty seas many of us run into from time to time. It's a conventional hull but runs just a few ticks slower than a similarly powered Fountain 35'. 1997 and up is the vintage to get if you can, a number of modifications to the hull had been completed by that time and it was as good as you could get until the closure of the company.

    It has timeless lines IMHO coupled with quality construction and good performance, hard to go wrong.
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Jassman View Post
    First off, Im not trying to start a war..Im doing some research for a buddy who is looking at another 33 foot boat that I dont want him to buy. I suggested these two models, and have been on both, but only 1-2's...and dont have enough seat time to answer his questions properly. As to comfort and size I gave the nod to AT.. as to looks I choose PP.. Which boat is quicker and handles various types of water...better.. Thanks for the help. Jeff

    Not sure the boats are both at the same price point currently. The PP's have been out of production since 2005 and AT's 33 is newer than that for sure.
    You can probably score 2 33 PP's for what you can buy a used 33 AT for.

    If I was looking for old school it would be the PP and if I was looking for an all around great boat, layout etc the nod would go to AT.

    For the record I have never been on an AT.....
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #6
    Charter Member clayinaustin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,717
    uh, why not just find smoother water?
    If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck!
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #7
    Registered hotjava66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    258
    as long as cabin space and comfort is not important the PP is a great boat
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
     
    #8
    Registered POWERPLAY33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Lk. st. Clair
    Posts
    215
    cabin is pretty roomy in a PP...
    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
     
    #9
    The Powerplay "design" has a proven heritage that goes way back...that boat was unstoppable in rough waters and owns many championships - a lot of people used to consider the Powerplay a smaller version of the Apache back in its day.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails DSC00699.JPG   Renegade w-flag.jpg  
    Last edited by Steve2; 03-28-2010 at 03:16 PM.
    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
     
    #10
    Contributor Steve 1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Beautiful Fort Lauderdale
    Posts
    2,333
    I was banging rub rails with the 32 Cobra Harry O in the Gulf Stream, Dam fine running boat and was talking to Joel about getting one a couple days later.
    Slippery when wet. PODLESS TUNNEL www.cheetahcat.com ,Repairs, Modifications and Truing Cheap reliable speed.
    Reply With Quote
     

  11. Collapse Details
     
    #11
    This will magically transform into an Apache thread in 3 2 1.....................
    Reply With Quote
     

  12. Collapse Details
     
    #12
    Founding Member cosmic12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Syr.N.Y. sometimes
    Posts
    1,361
    Jass, you try'n to draw in the Cult here?

    As I am sure you know his needs and wallet size.
    Price and availability= PP, thier are only 3 or 4 33 A.T.'s

    Cabin /comfert/ amennities/ along with very respectable performance A.T.

    Pats gona get you for this ya know
    Reply With Quote
     

  13. Collapse Details
     
    #13
    Registered hotjava66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    258
    Quote Originally Posted by POWERPLAY33 View Post
    cabin is pretty roomy in a PP...
    wasnt bashing, im a big fan of the 33PP but compared to the A/T the cabin is tight. Im pretty tall and basically have to lie down in a PP cabin.
    Reply With Quote
     

  14. Collapse Details
     
    #14
    Founding Member - E Dock GENERAL LEE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    GLOC/A1A
    Posts
    865
    I've been in both boats, 2 AT's, & 1 PP of this size, and would have to say they both run almost identical to each other, with the AT getting the nod overall. One of the AT's had around 550-600hp a side, and the other had over 1000hp a side..... The PP had 500's.

    Comparing strictly the hull design & lines, I think the PP is currently the better looking of the two. But JS' comment earlier about PP's being out of production since 05, also means PP's are starting to look dated.

    They both run like they are 33's, meaning they don't feel like 38's, or like 29's, like some boats can. Your friend would be in a great boat with either one really, and depending on if I could find one of the REALLY clean, updated ones, I'd probably buy the Powerplay just looking at MY personal boating needs.

    PS: I have a friend that has a 33 AT with new 496's in it, trailer, & 6 pack seats if you'd want to forward it on to him.
    Reply With Quote
     

  15. Collapse Details
     
    #15
    Sponsor ActiveThunder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Pompano Beach, Florida
    Posts
    53
    I think there's some confusion.

    You have the 32 AT which is the same as the 33 PP pretty much. Different deck look and freeboard.

    The 33 is a full foot + longer with the patented step DDC hull.

    I'm sure JJ knows this but wasn't clear at the time since his mind was on fertilizing his lawn at the time he posted.... Something that takes an hour.
    Reply With Quote
     

  16. Collapse Details
     
    #16
    Charter Member Jassman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Diamondead, MS
    Posts
    474
    Quote Originally Posted by GENERAL LEE View Post
    I've been in both boats, 2 AT's, & 1 PP of this size, and would have to say they both run almost identical to each other, with the AT getting the nod overall. One of the AT's had around 550-600hp a side, and the other had over 1000hp a side..... The PP had 500's.

    Comparing strictly the hull design & lines, I think the PP is currently the better looking of the two. But JS' comment earlier about PP's being out of production since 05, also means PP's are starting to look dated.

    They both run like they are 33's, meaning they don't feel like 38's, or like 29's, like some boats can. Your friend would be in a great boat with either one really, and depending on if I could find one of the REALLY clean, updated ones, I'd probably buy the Powerplay just looking at MY personal boating needs.

    PS: I have a friend that has a 33 AT with new 496's in it, trailer, & 6 pack seats if you'd want to forward it on to him.
    Thanks for the info..I didnt know AT built a 6-pack.. I know he's not up for that...but I will run it by him. Thanks for the help. Jeff
    Reply With Quote
     

  17. Collapse Details
     
    #17
    Founding Member cosmic12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Syr.N.Y. sometimes
    Posts
    1,361
    Quote Originally Posted by ActiveThunder View Post
    I think there's some confusion.

    You have the 32 AT which is the same as the 33 PP pretty much. Different deck look and freeboard.

    The 33 is a full foot + longer with the patented step DDC hull.

    I'm sure JJ knows this but wasn't clear at the time since his mind was on fertilizing his lawn at the time he posted.... Something that takes an hour.
    Pat great to see ya here

    You sure it was the lawn and not some custom pizza
    Reply With Quote
     

  18. Collapse Details
     
    #18
    Quote Originally Posted by GENERAL LEE View Post
    But JS' comment earlier about PP's being out of production since 05, also means PP's are starting to look dated.
    how does a boat like that look or become dated?
    does Santa's sleigh have a blower ?
    Reply With Quote
     

  19. Collapse Details
     
    #19
    Charter Member Sydwayz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    All over da place.
    Posts
    699
    Quote Originally Posted by GENERAL LEE View Post
    I've been in both boats, 2 AT's, & 1 PP of this size, and would have to say they both run almost identical to each other, with the AT getting the nod overall. One of the AT's had around 550-600hp a side, and the other had over 1000hp a side..... The PP had 500's.

    Comparing strictly the hull design & lines, I think the PP is currently the better looking of the two. But JS' comment earlier about PP's being out of production since 05, also means PP's are starting to look dated.

    They both run like they are 33's, meaning they don't feel like 38's, or like 29's, like some boats can. Your friend would be in a great boat with either one really, and depending on if I could find one of the REALLY clean, updated ones, I'd probably buy the Powerplay just looking at MY personal boating needs.

    PS: I have a friend that has a 33 AT with new 496's in it, trailer, & 6 pack seats if you'd want to forward it on to him.
    I believe you are referring to the Jesse James boat with the 6 pack, right Brandon?

    If so, that boat is a 32 Active Thunder, and has had a couple of facelifts since it was built. The last 32 Active Thunder was made around 2002.

    The 33 Active Thunder is a 9/10 scale version of the 37 Active Thunder, including the DDC step hull. The first one was produced in 2006.

    The 32 and 33 Active Thunders are completely different boats and don't share a single thing, except the name.

    I can't comment on a ride comparison, as I've never been out on a 33PP (just a 38PP). I think R'Addiction has been on boat boats.
    Brian Tillett; Active Thunder Factory Representative
    wwwActiveThunderBoats.com
    brian(a)activethunderboats.com
    Reply With Quote
     

  20. Collapse Details
     
    #20
    Charter Member Gladhe8er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Norwalk, CT
    Posts
    972
    I have been in a 33 PP. Rides exactly like a bigger version of my boat(28 AT). 33 PP will run 73-76 with 496 HO's.
    www.blackduckcafe.net
    Reply With Quote
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •