Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 68
  1. Collapse Details
     
    #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Ratickle View Post
    We had a smallblock here.....
    Those look like wings and you don't have no girl!
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #22
    SO Tech Expert/Competitor/Charter Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Downtown Ruby, MI
    Posts
    213
    Rat if you look close you can just make you out under my spray.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 5488_1103006220850_1397557745_30272869_8128239_n.jpg  
    The Michigan Madman
    url]www.crockettmarineengines.com[/url]
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
     
    #23
    Just keep it simple. Max cubic inches, speed, and no power adders.
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #24
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    PALM BEACH FL
    Posts
    42
    I second that ! as long as max cubes isnt 350 (im being sarcastic). The keep it simple philosophy sounds like a good idea. Mike
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #25
    Competitor sbracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Franconia, PA
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Shafts View Post
    Bilge,
    The reason I'd like to see props limited are cost. A used Bravo prop sells for 3-500.00 a used Hering starts at $2,500.
    Bob
    What is to keep someone from getting a Bravo and having it labbed or tweaked? How would this be enforced?

    I don't think we need a drive rule. The expense of a #6, if you could even install it on a 26' boat, outweighs the any benefit.

    I also don't think we need a prop rule.

    The pump fuel requirement is an interesting idea.

    I'm concerned how OPA is going to enforce the horsepower rule. Which boat will be the baseline? If Bilgerat and I have a similiar hull, but he has 75 more
    HP, do I need to catch up or does he need to tune down?

    Anyone else have any constructive input?
    Rich Smith
    Smith Brothers Offshore Racing Team
    Cotnertrailers.com 611
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #26
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    PALM BEACH FL
    Posts
    42
    Would a horsepower to weight ratio make any sense ? or possibly a hull efficiency ratio to horspower ?
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #27
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    PALM BEACH FL
    Posts
    42
    Both Glenn and myself really want to run class 6, it just makes sense with a 24 pantera, but the pantera hull is nowhere as efficient as say a velocity or a stepped or vented hull, plus the weight is considerably different, so the pantera would suck with an equal h.p., On the other hand I can understand someone trying to run a stock boat would be frustrated seeing a monster h.p. motor . The h.p. to weight or hull efficiency to weight kind of makes sense. My $.02 thanks Mike
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
     
    #28
    Competitor
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    River City
    Posts
    145
    or we could leave well enough alone and base everything on the GPS.
    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
     
    #29
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    PALM BEACH FL
    Posts
    42
    Fast Shafts, You do that and were in, end of discussion !!! mike
    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
     
    #30
    Competitor
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    River City
    Posts
    145
    Rico,
    Sooner or later, someone will show up with a blower and a #6. "Stepping down" has always been a problem in Offshore Racing. Back in the late 1970's guys started running 35' Cigarettes in Modified when they were really an Open class raceboat. Different times, but the same will happen unless parameters are placed.
    Bob
    Reply With Quote
     

  11. Collapse Details
     
    #31
    Competitor sbracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Franconia, PA
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Shafts View Post
    or we could leave well enough alone and base everything on the GPS.
    By leaving well enough alone do you mean we keep the 500 HP rule??
    Rich Smith
    Smith Brothers Offshore Racing Team
    Cotnertrailers.com 611
    Reply With Quote
     

  12. Collapse Details
     
    #32
    Competitor sbracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Franconia, PA
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Shafts View Post
    Rico,
    Sooner or later, someone will show up with a blower and a #6. "Stepping down" has always been a problem in Offshore Racing. Back in the late 1970's guys started running 35' Cigarettes in Modified when they were really an Open class raceboat. Different times, but the same will happen unless parameters are placed.
    Bob
    The OPA rulebook does state that OPA will put a boat in the class it feels the boat belongs. I trust the OPA enough that your example would never happen.

    I would think, also, that a horsepower limit of some sort would preclude it as well.
    Rich Smith
    Smith Brothers Offshore Racing Team
    Cotnertrailers.com 611
    Reply With Quote
     

  13. Collapse Details
     
    #33
    Competitor sbracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Franconia, PA
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by ricochet myk View Post
    Both Glenn and myself really want to run class 6, it just makes sense with a 24 pantera, but the pantera hull is nowhere as efficient as say a velocity or a stepped or vented hull, plus the weight is considerably different, so the pantera would suck with an equal h.p., On the other hand I can understand someone trying to run a stock boat would be frustrated seeing a monster h.p. motor . The h.p. to weight or hull efficiency to weight kind of makes sense. My $.02 thanks Mike
    Smitty has said, in a previous post, exactly the issue you are presenting. The
    trick now is figuring out the fairest way to implement it.
    Rich Smith
    Smith Brothers Offshore Racing Team
    Cotnertrailers.com 611
    Reply With Quote
     

  14. Collapse Details
     
    #34
    Right now we are working on a class 6 boat.. it's going to be good.
    Last edited by p-f-e; 02-03-2010 at 09:58 PM.
    Reply With Quote
     

  15. Collapse Details
     
    #35
    Working with emotions and feelings wont work. Where does the line stop. There is talk about props, drives, etc. You can be very specific and even add no steps on the bottom for a class. Where does it end. If i was in charge, i would create simple rules
    Reply With Quote
     

  16. Collapse Details
     
    #36
    Founding Member / Super Moderator Ratickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    37,351
    Blog Entries
    44
    Quote Originally Posted by Tyler Crockett View Post
    Rat if you look close you can just make you out under my spray.
    Oops,
    Getting bad advice is unfortunate, taking bad advice is a Serious matter!!
    Reply With Quote
     

  17. Collapse Details
     
    #37
    Founding Member / Super Moderator Ratickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    37,351
    Blog Entries
    44
    Quote Originally Posted by DrGaryDC View Post
    Working with emotions and feelings wont work. Where does the line stop. There is talk about props, drives, etc. You can be very specific and even add no steps on the bottom for a class. Where does it end. If i was in charge, i would create simple rules
    I believe, and Pat will have to step in for this year, when I chatted with POPRA last year I was told they will drive the boat. If it is too fast, you will not be in the slower class. In SBI, I believe if you break out, you will be moved up. In OPA, it's pretty much anything goes, just don't break out, and you're fine. Class 6 is the only one they are considering the exception to I believe. That is to make sure the boats with high horsepower do not step that far. (I think)
    Getting bad advice is unfortunate, taking bad advice is a Serious matter!!
    Reply With Quote
     

  18. Collapse Details
     
    #38
    Competitor
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    River City
    Posts
    145
    Since the rule meeting is less than 30 hrs away, is there any other input? Alot of this thread focused on the drives/props, what about setback boxes or 93 octane? I feel by keeping it affordable, it encourages participation and goes along with the rulebook's characterization of class 6 being "entry level".
    Bob
    Reply With Quote
     

  19. Collapse Details
     
    #39
    No Race Fuel
    No Blower motors
    No Speed masters of any number
    No Pouting.

    Keep It Simple.
    Reply With Quote
     

  20. Collapse Details
    #40
    Competitor
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    River City
    Posts
    145
    Thumbs up
    2TR,
    I agree! I would make an exception/grandfather AKULA since he is running a blower (I think??). The best rule you came up with is the "NO POUTING"
    Reply With Quote
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •