Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 35
  1. Collapse Details
    New safety rules
    #1
    C1 and X cat have introduced new rules as a result of the Victory crash centered around improving cockpit safety including mandatory structural additions to the cockpit area and accordingly have increased the minimum weight for the C1 by 400 lbs and Xcat by 175 lbs. The Victory boat took off at approx 125 mph and hit the water (upside down)at 109 mph with the resulting damage we have all seen. These speeds are within the normal racing speeds of all the Cat classes including X cat and SCL. Are the/should the US racing orgs going to follow suit.
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #2
    Charter Member / Competitor Ryan Beckley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sarasota, Fl
    Posts
    746
    I read the new rules and they are going to obsolete about 1/2 of the X cats class already. It seems to me that they are grasping to make it look like they are doing something. Unfortunately it took a Victory Team Class 1 accident to bring this to the forefront. When I raced there in April a racer was killed in a poorly constructed X Cat boat but no one knows about that... Some of the mandates are great but not many teams will be able to complete them all before the start of the season. I expect to see some teams bail out of those series and be racing in the states this year. Canopy safety definitely needs to be looked at as well as building techniques. I,for one, don't agree with the addition of Rally Car types of seat being mandatory, as it seems to me, they limit mobility of getting out of the boat for some people. I think that the safety people of OSS are second to none and police the safety as good as any sanction that I personally have seen or raced with.
    Last edited by Ryan Beckley; 01-21-2010 at 09:47 PM.
    Ryan Beckley
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
     
    #3
    ryan can you put a link to these new rules ?

    if the new safety rules limit the boats in x-cat would it be wise to let them race that same boat here in the US?

    how did they mandate the additional weight to say that it somehow improves safety?
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #4
    Charter Member / Competitor Ryan Beckley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sarasota, Fl
    Posts
    746
    The added weight is so that teams can strengthen their canopy structure and not add too much weight.

    I have the rules in a format that can't be posted..... I can email them to interested parties.

    Of the boats that may race here they are actually some of the safest ones there.....

    There are MANY there that would not pass OSS safety tech here....
    Ryan Beckley
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan Beckley View Post
    The added weight is so that teams can strengthen their canopy structure and not add too much weight.

    I have the rules in a format that can't be posted..... I can email them to interested parties.

    Of the boats that may race here they are actually some of the safest ones there.....

    There are MANY there that would not pass OSS safety tech here....
    i have not read the new rules but unless the added weight has to permently mount, how does this force teams to actually build a safer boat?

    unless the weight is without moveable ballast, the lazy teams will just add more ballast ???
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #6
    Could you send them to me gearboxes@hotmail.com

    thanks Ryan

    Can you describe the xcat wreck?
    Unique Innovative Drivetrain Solutions
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #7
    Quote Originally Posted by skaterdave View Post
    i have not read the new rules but unless the added weight has to permently mount, how does this force teams to actually build a safer boat?

    unless the weight is without moveable ballast, the lazy teams will just add more ballast ???
    You have to meet the canopy specs, the weight increase is so you don't have to steal weight out of the boat elsewhere to strengthen the canopy/cockpit/windscreen system.

    There are plenty of poor canopy designs running around out there that the crews think they are safe in, ultimately, somebody (org) has to put their foot down and set some guidelines. We don't need any more canopies coming apart in incidents that they should easily handle.
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
     
    #8
    Charter Member / Competitor Ryan Beckley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sarasota, Fl
    Posts
    746
    The X Cat wreck was in a newer Hotboat. The boat crashed and flipped. The hull broke, the window broke, the rear cockpit bulkhead broke, the lid failed......
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails DubaiPics 038.jpg   DubaiPics 042.jpg   DubaiPics 096.jpg  

    Ryan Beckley
    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
     
    #9
    Ryan,
    What speed do you think they were traveling at?
    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
     
    #10
    It's difficult to tell from the pictures but the shape looks good but very thin.
    Reply With Quote
     

  11. Collapse Details
     
    #11
    thanks Ryan,

    The "A" pillar is pointed right at the opening and not across the lid...not good.

    pat W
    Unique Innovative Drivetrain Solutions
    Reply With Quote
     

  12. Collapse Details
     
    #12
    Registered BradH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Atlanta/1000 Islands
    Posts
    125
    What are they doing to improve diver/rescuer response time?

    Can someone post the new/revised canopy specs?
    Reply With Quote
     

  13. Collapse Details
     
    #13
    Founding Member / Super Moderator Ratickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    37,397
    Blog Entries
    44
    Quote Originally Posted by shifter View Post
    thanks Ryan,

    The "A" pillar is pointed right at the opening and not across the lid...not good.

    pat W
    Sorry Pat, I don't understand. Can you sketch what you're describing, or fill in this bonehead....
    Getting bad advice is unfortunate, taking bad advice is a Serious matter!!
    Reply With Quote
     

  14. Collapse Details
     
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by BradH View Post
    What are they doing to improve diver/rescuer response time?

    Can someone post the new/revised canopy specs?
    Hope this works
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Maritimo Safety Proposal.pdf  
    Reply With Quote
     

  15. Collapse Details
     
    #15
    X-Cat
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails SAFETY REPORT - XCAT 3.pdf  
    Reply With Quote
     

  16. Collapse Details
     
    #16
    To shrink the file size on the X-Cat safety report I removed 2 pages, a blank 19 and a disclaimer page 13 I think. so if the numbers don't line up you know why.
    Reply With Quote
     

  17. Collapse Details
     
    #17
    Charter Member / Competitor Ryan Beckley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sarasota, Fl
    Posts
    746
    Those ARE NOT the additions that just came out...
    Ryan Beckley
    Reply With Quote
     

  18. Collapse Details
     
    #18
    You are correct..Thanks
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails SAFETY REPORT - XCAT 4.pdf  
    Reply With Quote
     

  19. Collapse Details
     
    #19
    Charter Member / Competitor Ryan Beckley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sarasota, Fl
    Posts
    746
    Thanks for posting.....
    Ryan Beckley
    Reply With Quote
     

  20. Collapse Details
     
    #20
    "It seems to me that they are grasping to make it look like they are doing something."

    Ryan, I don't think that is a fair statement. There has been an accident, an investigation and then a recommendation to improve cockpit safety, which has then been converted into new rules by the WPPA. In the US in the last 2 seasons there have been several racing accidents resulting in cockpit failures and 2 deaths. I am yet to see any recommendation from any US org coming out of any investigation into these crashes.
    Reply With Quote
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •